<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome vs Safari vs FireFox, who are the RAM killer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://henstudio.com/web-tools/2010/06/15/google-chrome-vs-safari-vs-firefox-who-are-the-ram-killer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://henstudio.com/web-tools/2010/06/15/google-chrome-vs-safari-vs-firefox-who-are-the-ram-killer/</link>
	<description>kuching web design and development based in sarawak, malaysia. creative global network website design services.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Verdade ou mito? O Firefox consome muita memória &#124; Espírito de Aventura</title>
		<link>http://henstudio.com/web-tools/2010/06/15/google-chrome-vs-safari-vs-firefox-who-are-the-ram-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-13736</link>
		<dc:creator>Verdade ou mito? O Firefox consome muita memória &#124; Espírito de Aventura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 09:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://henstudio.com/?p=6087#comment-13736</guid>
		<description>[...] é muito dito, inclusive tendem a usar o termo &#8220;crapware&#8221;. Mas, de acordo com testes recentes, o consumo do Firefox em si não é pesado. O problema está no número de complementos instalados, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] é muito dito, inclusive tendem a usar o termo &#8220;crapware&#8221;. Mas, de acordo com testes recentes, o consumo do Firefox em si não é pesado. O problema está no número de complementos instalados, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hen</title>
		<link>http://henstudio.com/web-tools/2010/06/15/google-chrome-vs-safari-vs-firefox-who-are-the-ram-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-13093</link>
		<dc:creator>Hen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 02:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://henstudio.com/?p=6087#comment-13093</guid>
		<description>&quot;Chrome is the RAM killer~~!!!!! If you installed extensions on it.&quot;

Those extension are some well known extension, no matter which extension i tried, it just take additional memory usage, even im not using them. So it is better don&#039;t use any extension with Chrome or Chrome should change / fix this. 

I guess Google need more time to work on their Web Browser, since they are new in this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Chrome is the RAM killer~~!!!!! If you installed extensions on it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Those extension are some well known extension, no matter which extension i tried, it just take additional memory usage, even im not using them. So it is better don&#8217;t use any extension with Chrome or Chrome should change / fix this. </p>
<p>I guess Google need more time to work on their Web Browser, since they are new in this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ngu Soon Hui</title>
		<link>http://henstudio.com/web-tools/2010/06/15/google-chrome-vs-safari-vs-firefox-who-are-the-ram-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-13092</link>
		<dc:creator>Ngu Soon Hui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 23:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://henstudio.com/?p=6087#comment-13092</guid>
		<description>The  RAM killer should be Chrome&#039;s extension, not Chrome itself. FF should be the Biggest RAM killer.  

Most probably your Chrome&#039;s extension contain memory leaks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The  RAM killer should be Chrome&#8217;s extension, not Chrome itself. FF should be the Biggest RAM killer.  </p>
<p>Most probably your Chrome&#8217;s extension contain memory leaks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

